Mention rate, all engines
31%
151 of 481 runs
Best engine
42%
Claude
Measured
15 prompts
4 engines, 30 September 2026 to 30 September 2026
Mention rate per engine
Share of engine runs whose answer named the brand, from 10 run tests.
| Engine | Mention rate | Runs | Last measured | Engine version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPTImported baseline | 31% | 46 of 150 runs | 30 September 2026 | chat-latest |
| GeminiImported baseline | 28% | 42 of 150 runs | 30 September 2026 | gemini-3-flash-preview |
| ClaudeImported baseline | 42% | 63 of 150 runs | 30 September 2026 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Google AI OverviewsImported baseline | 0% | 0 of 31 runs | 30 September 2026 | not reported |
Imported baseline: measured before the brand was tracked in the product, then imported with the engine version of every run. It is drawn as its own segment and never joined to the product trend line.
Google AI Overviews are fetched 3 times per prompt rather than 10, because the overview is a search result page, not a chat answer.
Mention rate over time
One point per engine per measurement date. Imported and engine change periods are marked.
| Date | Engine | Mention rate | Runs | Engine version | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 September 2026 | ChatGPT | 31% | 46 of 150 runs | chat-latest | Imported baseline |
| 30 September 2026 | Claude | 42% | 63 of 150 runs | claude-sonnet-5-5 | Imported baseline |
| 30 September 2026 | Gemini | 28% | 42 of 150 runs | gemini-3-flash-preview | Imported baseline |
| 30 September 2026 | Google AI Overviews | 0% | 0 of 31 runs | not reported | Imported baseline |
Imported points are the baseline. No engine change has been recorded so far. A period is marked as one when an engine changes its model version or the control prompts move by more than 10 points, and it is then not credited to any fix.
Every prompt, every engine
The consistency label from the latest 10 run test, with the runs that named the brand.
| Prompt | Stage | ChatGPT | Gemini | Claude | Google AI Overviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best LinkedIn SDR automation tool for agency owners | Discovery | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/2imported |
| LinkedIn outreach tool to run multiple client accounts for my agency | Discovery | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/1imported |
| HeyReach alternative with AI that answers LinkedIn replies | Discovery | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | ERROR0/0imported |
| white label LinkedIn outreach automation for agencies | Discovery | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/1imported |
| AI SDR for LinkedIn I can drive from Claude Code | Discovery | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/3imported |
| LinkedIn MCP server that sends connection requests safely | Discovery | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/2imported |
| Claude Code plugin for LinkedIn outreach | Discovery | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/3imported |
| safest LinkedIn automation for client accounts, residential IP, own session | Discovery | INVISIBLE0/10imported | WEAK1/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/2imported |
| What is SDR Pilot (sdrpilot.ai)? | Branded | STRONG10/10imported | WEAK1/10imported | STRONG10/10imported | INVISIBLE0/3imported |
| SDR Pilot pricing | Pricing | WEAK3/10imported | STRONG7/10imported | STRONG10/10imported | INVISIBLE0/3imported |
| SDR Pilot agency plan price | Pricing | MODERATE4/10imported | MODERATE4/10imported | STRONG10/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/2imported |
| Does SDR Pilot have a free trial? How many days? | Pricing | MODERATE5/10imported | STRONG8/10imported | STRONG10/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/2imported |
| SDR Pilot vs HeyReach | Comparison | STRONG9/10imported | STRONG9/10imported | STRONG10/10imported | INVISIBLE0/3imported |
| SDR Pilot vs Dripify | Comparison | STRONG8/10imported | MODERATE5/10imported | STRONG10/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/2imported |
| SDR Pilot reviews | Comparison | STRONG7/10imported | STRONG7/10imported | WEAK3/10imported | INCONCLUSIVE0/2imported |
| best LinkedIn automation tool for recruitersControl | Control | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/3imported |
| Sales Navigator alternatives for B2B sales teamsControl | Control | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/10imported | INVISIBLE0/3imported |
STRONG, MODERATE, WEAK and INVISIBLE are the 10 run labels explained on the methodology page. A 0 of 10 counts only when every run finished and the engine searched the web. Control prompts get no page, post or pitch; their movement is our estimate of engine drift.
Against the competitors
Runs that named the brand versus runs that named each competitor, same prompts.
| Competitor | Runs naming the brand | Runs naming the competitor | Share of voice |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeyReachheyreach.io | 151 | 201 | 43% |
| Expandiexpandi.io | 151 | 140 | 52% |
| Dripifydripify.io | 151 | 92 | 62% |
| SalesRobotsalesrobot.co | 151 | 0 | 100% |
| Waalaxywaalaxy.com | 151 | 0 | 100% |
Where the brand is missing
The prompts no measured run named it for, and any answer that got it wrong.
- best LinkedIn SDR automation tool for agency owners: not named on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews
- LinkedIn outreach tool to run multiple client accounts for my agency: not named on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews
- HeyReach alternative with AI that answers LinkedIn replies: not named on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini
- white label LinkedIn outreach automation for agencies: not named on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews
- AI SDR for LinkedIn I can drive from Claude Code: not named on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews
- LinkedIn MCP server that sends connection requests safely: not named on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews
- Claude Code plugin for LinkedIn outreach: not named on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews
- safest LinkedIn automation for client accounts, residential IP, own session: not named on ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI Overviews
- What is SDR Pilot (sdrpilot.ai)?: not named on Google AI Overviews
- SDR Pilot pricing: not named on Google AI Overviews
- SDR Pilot agency plan price: not named on Google AI Overviews
- Does SDR Pilot have a free trial? How many days?: not named on Google AI Overviews
- SDR Pilot vs HeyReach: not named on Google AI Overviews
- SDR Pilot vs Dripify: not named on Google AI Overviews
- SDR Pilot reviews: not named on Google AI Overviews
Sources the engines cite that include the brand
Pages an engine cited in an answer that also mention the brand.
| Page | Kind | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| heyreach.io | vendor | Claude, ChatGPT |
| sdrpilot.ai | vendor | Claude, ChatGPT |
| unifygtm.com | other | Claude |
| unifygtm.com | other | Claude |
| apollo.io | other | Claude |
| apollo.io | other | Claude |
| mattheinz.substack.com | forum | Claude |
| sdrpilot.ai | vendor | ChatGPT |
| sdrpilot.ai | vendor | ChatGPT |
| g2.com | review_site | Claude |
| help.sdrpilot.ai | vendor | ChatGPT |
| help.sdrpilot.ai | vendor | ChatGPT |
| help.sdrpilot.ai | vendor | ChatGPT |
| sdrpilot.ai | vendor | ChatGPT |
| themanagersbrief.substack.com | forum | Claude |
| us.fitgap.com | other | Claude |
| sdrpilot.ai | vendor | ChatGPT |
| sdrpilot.ai | vendor | ChatGPT |
| g2.com | review_site | Claude |
| g2.com | review_site | Claude |
The fix log
Every change we shipped for this brand, dated, with the link and commit where there is one.
No fix has been logged for this brand yet. Each fix gets a dated entry here the day it goes live, so the next 10 run test can be read against it.
How this was measured
The same engines, labels and rules every customer gets.
Day 0 is the baseline we froze on 30 September 2026, before any page was written for these prompts. It was measured outside the product with the same engine versions the product uses, then imported, so it is drawn as an imported segment.
This case starts at zero on purpose. The prompts are the questions an agency owner asks when shopping for LinkedIn outreach, and the brand was not named for most of them on day 0.
LinkedIn posts, outreach and site work run in parallel. The case claims all changes since day 0 as a set, with the fix log below as the record, and never credits one fix with a change on its own.
What we wrote down as success before the first measurement, and do not edit afterwards:
- Primary metric: the mention rate on the targeted discovery prompts, per engine, from 10 run tests.
- Success at day 90: at least 30% on at least two engines, and the targeted prompts at least 20 points above the control prompts on those same engines.
- Control prompts get no page, post or pitch. Their movement is our estimate of engine drift.
- If the controls move by more than 10 points in a period, or an engine changes its model, that period is marked as an engine change and not credited to any fix.
- Day 30 is a checkpoint, not a gate: any result is reported as it is, zero as zero.
Each engine is asked through its API with web search or grounding switched on, the way a buyer's question is answered today. A run counts as a mention only when the answer names the brand itself, not an echo of the question and not a different company with a similar name. The engine version shown is the model id the engine reported for that run.
What the measurement on this page cost us in engine fees: $0.22.
Measure Your Own Brand the Same Way
The Founder plan is $99 a month with a 14 day trial: your prompts, four engines, 10 run tests, the page grader and the fix log.